Sun | 29, June, 2025

For Regular Updates:

Pakistan Army vs Indian Military: How a Smaller Force Defended with Big Results

by | Jun 20, 2025 | Defense and Security

Pakistan Army vs Indian Military: How a Smaller Force Defended with Big Results When India launched a surprise military strike on Pakistan in May 2025, it wasn’t just a conflict—it was a test. A test between brute force and precise strategy. Between billions in defense spending and a few billion dollars backed by unmatched resolve. And when the dust settled, Pakistan stood firm—despite being outnumbered and outgunned Let’s break it down.
1. Budget Gap, But Not a Power Gap
  • Pakistan’s Military Budget: ~$7.6 Billion
  • India’s Military Budget: ~$75 Billion
That’s almost 10x more spending by India. In global rankings:
  • India: Top 5 military budgets in the world
  • Pakistan: Not even in the Top 35
Yet, the outcome didn’t follow the money. Because Pakistan proved one thing clearly: discipline and planning beat deep pockets.
2. Ground Strength: Tanks, Troops & More
Category India Pakistan
Active Troops ~1.45 million ~654,000
Main Battle Tanks ~4,700 (T-90, Arjun, T-72) ~2,400 (Al-Khalid, T-80)
Artillery Units ~10,000+ ~4,500+
While India has twice as many tanks, it’s not just the number—it’s how you use them. Pakistan’s Al-Khalid tank, co-produced with China, has night-fighting capability, advanced fire control, and better maneuverability in rough terrain. In real-time, Pakistan Army held key defense lines, especially across Azad Jammu & Kashmir, without giving up territory or showing panic.
3. Fighter Jets: JF-17 Thunder vs Rafale India’s Rafale
  • Manufacturer: Dassault (France)
  • Speed: Mach 1.8
  • Weapons: Meteor (long-range), SCALP (stealth missile)
  • Price per unit: ~$220 million
  • Specialty: Advanced radar + long-range air combat
Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder
  • Co-developed by Pakistan & China
  • Speed: Mach 1.6
  • Weapons: PL-15 (long-range), precision-guided bombs
  • Price per unit: ~$25 million
  • Specialty: Agile, combat-tested, and easily upgradable
Combat Outcome: During Operation Bunyan-um-Maroos, 3 Rafales were shot down by Pakistan Air Force. Meanwhile, JF-17s and J-10Cs led surgical strikes deep into Indian territory. JF-17s may cost 1/10th of a Rafale, but they delivered 10x the impact.
4. Air Defense & Drone Warfare India used:
  • S-400 systems (Russia) — Their most advanced missile shield
  • Harpy & Harop drones (Israel) — Designed to attack radars and air defenses
Pakistan countered with:
  • Indigenous jamming tech
  • Electromagnetic spectrum warfare
  • Standoff weapons and loitering munitions
Result: Pakistan destroyed 2 S-400 batteries (Adampur & Bhuj) and jammed dozens of drones mid-air. Military analysts were stunned: “S-400 was considered near-impossible to beat. Pakistan cracked it.”
5. Cyber & Spectrum Warfare: Pakistan’s Invisible Edge While bombs flew and drones buzzed, a digital war raged silently. Pakistan:
  • Jammed Indian military satellites
  • Hacked into command networks
  • Disrupted battlefield communications
This created panic in Indian ranks and delayed retaliation, giving Pakistan a psychological upper hand.
6. Economic Impact: The Market Reacts
  • Dassault Aviation (Rafale maker): Share prices fell
  • Chengdu Aerospace (JF-17 co-developer): Shares rose
Why? Because the battlefield footage told the truth: Pakistan’s jets dominated. “It wasn’t about who had better toys. It was about who used them better.”
7. India Asked for Ceasefire Despite initiating the conflict, India was the first to blink. As Pakistan’s retaliation unfolded, critical air bases, drone sites, and radar hubs were struck. India’s military losses mounted. Behind closed doors, India requested a ceasefire via diplomatic backchannels.
  • Pakistan did not escalate.
  • It did not target civilians.
  • It defended—and then stopped.
8. Not Just One Force: Three Services, One Response What made Pakistan’s response effective was its joint military execution:
  • Air Force: Led airstrikes and jamming ops
  • Army: Secured borders, coordinated radar command
  • Navy: Monitored Indian maritime movements & secured coastlines
This tri-service synergy is rarely seen in real-time combat. Pakistan pulled it off flawlessly.
9. The Bigger Message This wasn’t just about numbers. It was about discipline, clarity, and courage.
  • Pakistan didn’t want war
  • But it didn’t tolerate aggression
  • It showed the world that being smaller doesn’t mean being weak
“We are not the aggressor. But if war is imposed, we defend with unity, precision, and strength.” — DG ISPR
Final Word: Peace Through Power, Not Provocation Pakistan’s military success during Operation Bunyan-um-Maroos wasn’t luck. It was a well-calculated doctrine in action. Despite:
  • 10x smaller defense budget
  • Fewer tanks and aircraft
  • Limited technological imports
Pakistan stood tall—and defended every inch of its sovereignty Let the world remember: Pakistan doesn’t seek war, but it will end one if forced to.
Share this on

Related Posts